- Infosys MD & CEO Vishal Sikka resigns, Pravin Rao interim chief
- Rescue Hyderabad minor from Omani sheikh: Maneka Gandhi to Sushma Swaraj
- After SBI, now HDFC Bank and Yes Bank cut interest rate on savings
- Election Commissioner speaks out: 'Winning at all cost, without ethics, is new normal in politics'
- Karti Chidambaram says will appear before CBI on August 23, seeks protection
- USS Fitzgerald captain during collision that killed 7 to lose command
TRAI tariff order case: IBF and MSOs press for being allowed to implead in Madras HC
MUMBAI: The Madras High Court continued hearing the all-important TRAI’s draft tariff order and interconnection regulation case, with both the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) and the All India Digital Cable Federation (AIDCF) arguing to be impleaded as parties.
The IBF’s contention was that they represented the body of content creators and as broadcasters, the copyright matter directly impacted them.
The AIDCF, a representative body of multi-system operators (MSOs), also tried to convince the court that they have a stake in the matter and should be allowed to implead in the TRAI tariff order case.
The matter will come up for further hearing on 22 February.
Star and Vijay TV, the petitioners against TRAI’s draft tariff order, have been of the opinion that the MSOs are carriers of the broadcasters’ content and should not be permitted to implead in the case. While broadcasters are impacted, the distribution platform operators (DPOs) are not impacted as it is a copyright issue. They have no direct interest in the matter. While they can intervene, they should not be allowed to implead.
Earlier, the AIDCF and Videocon d2h had filed applications to be impleaded in the tariff order case in the Madras High Court. DPOs are in favour of TRAI’s draft tariff order, which has suggested MRP (maximum retail price) model for content pricing.
Last month, the Madras HC had adjourned the hearing in Star India and Vijay TV’s petition against TRAI’s draft tariff order and interconnection regulation until 17 February as senior counsel P Chidambaram, who is representing the two petitioners, was not available.
Star and Vijay have challenged TRAI’s jurisdiction to fix the price of content. The two parties contend that TRAI has overstepped its jurisdiction and violated the Copyright Act, which deals with all aspects of exploitation and monetisation of content.
In its reply to the Madras HC, TRAI had stated that the petition filed by Star India and Vijay TV were non-maintainable as the tariff order was still in the draft stage. It had also stated that the HC did not have the jurisdiction to hear this matter.
Meanwhile, TRAI had filed a special leave petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court which allowed the regulator to frame regulations. Once framed, the same will have to be placed before the apex court. In the interim, the Madras HC could continue hearing the Star and Vijay appeals, the SC had stated.
The matter was posted for hearing after four weeks.
As reported by TelevisionPost.com, TRAI had issued draft tariff order and interconnection regulation in October. It had sought stakeholders’ comments on the recommendations to make the tariff order more robust. The draft tariff order and regulations had followed an extensive consultation process by the authority involving all stakeholders.
What has rattled broadcasters like Star is TRAI’s suggestion of adopting a distribution model for TV channels in which broadcasters fix the MRP within the price cap set by TRAI for selling directly to the subscribers. High-definition (HD) channels are also under price cap, but premium channels have been excluded from price cap under the proposed new regime.
As per the genre caps prescribed by TRAI, sports channels have the highest price ceiling at Rs 19. General entertainment channels have a price ceiling of Rs 12. The ceiling for movie channels is Rs 10. Kids and infotainment channels can’t be priced above Rs 7 and 9 respectively. The cap for news channels is Rs 5 while that for devotional channels is Rs 3. The cost of an HD channel cannot exceed three times the cost of a corresponding SD channel.
DPOs will just act as intermediaries providing TV channels to consumers. Under the proposed new regime, DPOs will get a rental fee from the customers of up to Rs 130 for providing 100 standard-definition (SD) channels. A subscriber may request additional network capacity in bundles or lots of 25 SD channels at a rate of Rs 20 per month for subscribing to more than 100 channels.
Additionally, the DPOs will get 20% distribution fee from the broadcasters for collection and remittance of pay channel revenue. Thus, rental fee and distribution are the major revenue streams for DPOs besides carriage fee.
Unlike the current regime, the DPOs will not get any share from the subscription fee received as subscribers will pay based on the MRP published by the broadcaster.
To level the playing field, TRAI has also regulated the carriage fee by capping it at 20 paisa per channel per subscriber per month. Further, the carriage fee amount will decrease with increase in subscription. Broadcasters will not have to pay carriage fee if the subscription of the channel is more than or equal to 20% of the subscriber base.
The distributors of TV channels may offer discounts on the carriage fee rate declared by them not exceeding 35% of the rate of the carriage fee declared.