- PV Sindhu Enters Quarter-final of Hong Kong Open Super Series
- Padmavati cleared for Dec 1 release in Britain, SC allows advocate to file fresh plea
- Bharti family pledges Rs 7000 crore towards philanthropy
- Indian Navy gets its first woman pilot, 3 women NAI officers
- Colonel arrested for raping Lt- Colonel's daughter in Shimla
- Pradyuman murder case: Ashok was beaten, tortured and sedated to force his confession, claims wife
- Election Commission grants 'two leaves' symbol to unified AIADMK
Tariff order: Madras HC reserves verdict on Star–Vijay vs TRAI spat
MUMBAI: The Madras High Court today reserved its verdict in the dispute between Star India–Vijay TV and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) in the tariff order issue.
A decision is expected sometime in August. The parties, including Star India, Vijay TV, TRAI and intervenors All India Digital Cable Federation (AIDCF) and Videocon d2h, have filed their written submissions.
Star India had challenged TRAI’s tariff order and interconnection regulation, arguing that the regulator did not have any jurisdiction to do so.
Earlier on 6 May, the Supreme Court had stayed TRAI’s tariff order and interconnection regulation until the Madras High Court decided on the broadcaster’s petition challenging the regulator’s powers to fix tariff for TV content.
The apex court had also directed the HC to conclude the matter in four weeks with a day-to-day hearing while listing the matter for 12 June.
The bench of Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman had stayed the tariff order and interconnection regulation matter after the TRAI counsel submitted that the new regime would come into effect from 1 September.
Represented by senior counsels P Chidambaram, Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Amit Sibal, Star had argued that the new regime would unsettle the existing system. Once implemented, it would be difficult to go back to the old system in case the Madras High Court decided in the broadcaster’s favour, the broadcaster had argued.
The broadcaster had also argued that the matter got delayed at the Madras High Court due to the recusal of judges. It had also submitted that there was no hurry to implement the tariff order and the regulations now since it would officially take effect from 1 September.
Earlier, the Madras High Court had dismissed Star and Vijay TV’s petition for a stay on the tariff order and regulation until the completion of the jurisdiction appeal. This prompted Star to move the SC.
TRAI had notified the tariff order and interconnection regulation on 3 March, following a go-ahead from the Supreme Court. Moreover, the SC had stated that the Madras HC could continue to hear the issue of jurisdiction. While retaining most of the recommendations, TRAI had removed the genre-wise price ceiling. The authority said that any channel priced above Rs 19 should not be a part of the bouquet.
In December 2016, Star and Vijay had challenged TRAI’s jurisdiction to fix price of content. The Madras HC ordered TRAI to maintain status quo in the matter.
Irked by the order, TRAI filed a special leave petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court, which allowed the regulator to frame regulations with the condition that the same would have to be placed before the apex court before being notified.