- Post merger of HITS-Cable TV biz, IMCL’s FY17 net loss swells to Rs 206 crore
- RIL Surges 4% After Telecom Regulator Slashes Interconnect Charges
- Mumbai Rains: 34 domestic flights cancelled till 12 pm today, main runway remains shut
- Tata Sons buys big chunk of shares in group firms
- Swine flu: 42 positive case in Mohali
- HIV blood transfusion probe: High-level team gives clean chit to Regional Cancer Centre
- Flipkart, Amazon in Rs100 crore ad blitz
- Politicians may have helped Iqbal Kaskar net 100 crore in 3 years
- Mobile bills to go down as Trai cuts call termination charges to 6 p/min
Madras HC adjourns TRAI tariff order case till Tuesday
MUMBAI: The Madras High Court on Monday adjourned the tariff order case until Tuesday (25 April) due to paucity of time.
Earlier, Madras High Court Chief Justice Indira Banerjee had decided to hear the case after two division benches recused themselves from hearing the matter due to different reasons.
First, the two-member bench comprising Justices Nagamuthu and Anita Sumanth had recused from the case after an anonymous petition to the chief justice had claimed that Justice Nagamuthu had sought P Chidambaram’s help in becoming the judge.
Incidentally, Chidambaram is also appearing in the case on behalf of Star India and Vijay Television, who have challenged the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s (TRAI) tariff order and interconnection regulation.
The chief justice then notified the division bench of Justices S Manikumar and M Govindaraj to hear the matter. However, Justice S Manikumar recused himself from the case on the ground that he was hearing another matter involving TRAI.
Star India and Vijay TV had finished their arguments and it was TRAI’s turn to make its submissions. Even before the regulator could finish its arguments, the case took a new turn with the emergence of this petition.
Earlier, Star India and Vijay Television had amended their petition in the Madras HC by adding a new prayer for setting aside TRAI’s tariff order and interconnection regulation.
The broadcaster had contended that TRAI did not have the jurisdiction to regulate TV channel pricing. The two parties had earlier prayed that TRAI had overstepped its jurisdiction and violated the Copyright Act, which deals with all aspects of exploitation and monetisation of content.
TRAI had notified the tariff order and interconnection regulation on 3 March after the Supreme Court gave it the go ahead. The SC had earlier stated that the Madras HC could continue hearing the issue of jurisdiction.
While retaining most of the recommendations, TRAI had removed the genre-wise price ceiling. The authority said that any channel priced above Rs 19 could not be a part of the bouquet.
Earlier, the HC had disallowed the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) and the All India Digital Cable Federation (AIDCF) from impleading in the matter. However, they have been allowed as interveners in the matter.
In December 2016, Star and Vijay had challenged TRAI’s jurisdiction to fix price of content. The Madras HC ordered TRAI to maintain status quo.
A disgruntled TRAI then filed a special leave petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court, which allowed the regulator to frame regulations. However, the same would have to be placed before the apex court before being notified.