- Delhi: Worker dies after inhaling toxic gases while cleaning sewer inside hospital premises
- Bihar floods: Toll rises to 253, more than a crore people are now homeless
- Key accused in Rs 700-crore Bihar fund transfer scam dies in Bhagalpur hospital
- War won't give China any clear gain, only cause casualties, assesses govt
- Saudi carrier says Qatar has not approved hajj flights
- Three Kashmiri youth arrested for disrespecting National Anthem
- 2008 Malegaon Blast Case: Supreme Court Verdict On Lt Col Purohit's Bail Today
SC dismisses broadcasters’ plea against TDSAT order in NSTPL case relating to RIO
NEW DELHI: Broadcasters suffered a major setback as the Supreme Court dismissed their appeal against the TDSAT’s 7 December judgment mandating RIO as the starting point for negotiations between them and the distribution platforms.
The appeals of the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF), Star India and Taj Television challenging the Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal’s (TDSAT) order were dismissed after being admitted and heard by the apex court.
With the SC dismissing the appeals, the TDSAT judgment becomes final. The TDSAT’s order had also stated that Reference Interconnect Offer (RIO) must reflect not only the rates of channels but also the different bouquets in which the broadcaster wishes to offer its channels for distribution along with the rates of each of the formation or bouquet.
The matter traces back to the dispute between headend-in-the sky (HITS) operator Noida Software Technology Park Ltd (NSTPL), which operates under JAINHITS brand, and broadcasters Star India and Taj Television.
The broadcasters were represented by a battery of top lawyers including P Chidambaram for IBF, Amit Sibal and Gopal Jain for Star India, and Nageswara Rao for Taj. NSTPL was represented by KK Venugopal and Vivek Chib along with Sandeep Ladda.
Appearing on behalf of the IBF, senior counsel P Chidambaram said that the TDSAT order infringes on the broadcasters’ right to enter into mutual agreement under freedom of contract. He argued that broadcasters should be allowed to enter into mutual agreements.
L Nageswara Rao and Amit Sibal also made the same argument stating that by mandating agreements only on the basis of RIO, the tribunal is curtailing the freedom of contract. They also argued that the TDSAT judgment is flawed as the tribunal has tried to rewrite the regulation. The judgment, they said, also violates the Copyright Act.
Notwithstanding the argument put forth by the senior counsels, the bench comprising Justice Anil Dave and Justice Adarsh Goel remarked that the broadcasting sector is governed by the regulatory framework and everyone has to abide by that. They also said that the TDSAT has not come up with a new set of regulations and that it has only interpreted the prevailing regulation.
Earlier, the Delhi High Court had dismissed Star India’s petition against TDSAT orders in the same matter contending that the petition is not maintainable as the broadcaster has an alternative remedy to appeal in the SC. Subsequently, the IBF and Taj, along with Star, challenged the TDSAT order in the SC.
NSTPL had initially moved the TDSAT with the grievance that MediaPro, the erstwhile distribution joint venture between Star DEN and Zee Turner, is discriminating against it by denying it the supply of signals. After MediaPro split, Star India and Taj Television, the distribution arm of Zee, became the respondents in the case. The matter concluded with the TDSAT’s landmark judgment on 7 December.
The TDSAT judgment will come into force from 1 April. However, if the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) issues any new regulations before that date, those regulations will be binding on the broadcasters.
TRAI recently issued a consultation paper to develop a comprehensive tariff structure for platforms. In the consultation paper, the broadcast sector regulator discussed what price models would be suitable at the wholesale level in the broadcasting sector, whether there is need to regulate carriage fee, marketing fee and placement fee, and separate tariff for niche and HD channels. The last date for sending comments and counter comments on the consultation paper is 4 and 18 March.
|Snapshot of the TDSAT judgment
- TDSAT’s RIO angle in NSTPL case makes broadcasters approach Supreme Court
- Star mulls moving SC following Delhi HC order relating to RIO in NSTPL case
- RIO to form starting point for negotiations between broadcasters and platforms: TDSAT
- TRAI explains to TDSAT its stand on RIO and other interconnect agreement issues
- TRAI to examine if there is need to regulate carriage fee
- TRAI set to develop holistic tariff structure for distribution platforms