- Post merger of HITS-Cable TV biz, IMCL’s FY17 net loss swells to Rs 206 crore
- RIL Surges 4% After Telecom Regulator Slashes Interconnect Charges
- Mumbai Rains: 34 domestic flights cancelled till 12 pm today, main runway remains shut
- Tata Sons buys big chunk of shares in group firms
- Swine flu: 42 positive case in Mohali
- HIV blood transfusion probe: High-level team gives clean chit to Regional Cancer Centre
- Flipkart, Amazon in Rs100 crore ad blitz
- Politicians may have helped Iqbal Kaskar net 100 crore in 3 years
- Mobile bills to go down as Trai cuts call termination charges to 6 p/min
Fate of Sun TV Network hangs in the balance
NEW DELHI: The fate of Sun TV Network still hangs in the balance. While the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting held meetings with the law secretary and officials in the law ministry, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) kept a distance.
At the centre of the debate is the definition of economic security and whether it holds ground in denying security clearance to the 33 Sun TV channels. The MHA has denied Sun TV the security clearance and the MHA officials have still not started the consultation process with the law ministry.
That the MIB and the MHA are not in common agreement is obvious. The matter could now be referred to Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi even as Sun TV promoter Kalanithi Maran is set to be in Delhi this week to meet top officials from both home ministry and MIB and press his case for a security clearance, the Economic Times reported.
The MIB expects the MHA to come around if the AG’s opinion is in Sun TV’s favour but ET quoted MHA officials as saying that they are wary of an Hindalco case redux. MHA officials say a review at their level on MIB’s insistence or Sun TV promoter Kalanithi Maran’s letter for the same may mean a “lurking danger” of CBI questioning at some stage why the decision was changed, the ET report said.
Sun TV has indicated that it will move Madras High Court if its licence stands cancelled on account of denial of security clearance. While the MHA is concerned about the legal side of the case, it is reluctant to change its stand.