Live Post
JD(U) under Nitish decides to become part of NDA, denies split in party
Customs arrests Air India cabin crew for smuggling ganja
Government, RBI in talks to shore up PSU bank capital
Bihar flood toll mounts to 153, 17 districts affected
IndiGo cancels 84 flights over engine issues
Trai gets tough on call drops; slaps penalty of upto Rs 10 lakh
Yogi Adityanath targets 'Yuvraj' Rahul Gandhi: 'Will not permit Gorakhpur to become picnic spot'
Shivraj to lead BJP in 2018 election: Amit Shah

ESPN’s 7 mn subscriber loss in 2 years is matter of concern for sportscasters in the US

MUMBAI: There is a lesson to be learnt by sports broadcasters across the world. With cord-cutting in the US growing and audiences migrating online to platforms like Netflix, leading sports broadcasters can suffer loss in subscriber numbers and this can have deep financial repercussions in the wake of high acquisition costs.

ESPN, the leader sports channel and biggest growth driver of Disney, has shocked the industry with its disclosure that it has lost three million subscribers in its recent fiscal year.

The sportscaster has, in fact, shed seven million subscribers in two years. It has 92 million subscribers, down from 95 million a year ago and from 99 million two years back. According to industry estimates, ESPN’s affiliate revenues is $650 million less than what it was making two years back.

ESPN at $6.10 per subscriber is the most costly pay TV channel. The problem is that ESPN coughs out an estimated amount of $6 billion a year towards rights fees. This means that it cannot afford to let its number of subscribers slide. This will hurt not only its affiliate revenues but also impact its advertising income.

SNL Kagan has provided interesting figures. These are, though, a year old.

  1. ESPN $6.61 x 94.5 million homes = $7.5 billion
  2. NFL Network $1.31 x 73.6 million homes = $1.16 billion
  3. FS1 .99 x 91.2 million homes = $1.08 billion
  4. ESPN2 .83 x 94.5 million homes = $941.2 million
  5. SEC Network .66 x 69.1 million homes = $547.3 million
  6. Golf Channel .35 x 79.4 million homes = $332.2 million
  7. NBC Sports Network .30 x 83.1 million homes = $299 million
  8. Big Ten Network .39 x 62 million homes = $290.2 million
  9. MLB Network .26 x 71.3 million homes = $222.5 million
  10. FS2 .28 x 64 million homes = $215 million
  11. NBA TV .29 x 57.2 million homes = $199 million
  12. ESPNU .22 x 74.9 million homes = $198 million
  13. CBS Sports Network .26 x 61 million homes = $190.3 million
  14. NHL Network .32 x 37.4 million homes = $143.6 million
  15. Pac 12 Network .39 x 12.3 million homes = $57.6 million

The alarm is that there are serious doubts whether that trend of subscriber decline can reverse. People in large numbers in the US are moving to a la carte choices, available through streaming services and smartphone apps, even as cable TV bills are rising. If subscriber numbers do not grow, the financial situation can worsen due to high sports-rights costs.

Cord-cutting in the US is impacting all broadcasters. In case of sportscasters, the impact will be more as acquiring live programming costs are high.

In markets like India, traditional television is growing. But what if the trend changes fast and online viewing grows rapidly?